Carlisle Council for Voluntary Service
committed to excellence in the voluntary sector

History Staff News Services & Resources Membership
Health Fact Sheets Newsletter Funding Volunteering Rural Audit
Organisational Development & Training CVS Toolkit Carlisle Hub
Carlisle Rural Audit :
Findings
|
The research in this project was collected from key local
people, these included for example; Parish Clerks, Village Hall Secretaries,
Schools, Churches, Women’s Institute Secretaries etc. The information was
collected mostly through postal surveys, however informal interviews, and
telephone surveys were also used. The total number of postal survey sent out was
398, this report is based on the data from these surveys.
The project successfully highlighted 463 rural community groups in the
Carlisle District (nine of which were groups provided by the Carlisle District
Adult Education Centres). Prior to this project we were unaware of any previous mapping of community groups in rural Carlisle.
The project studied all of the settlements listed by the Carlisle City Council for the Carlisle District. This list contained 108 settlements. The project highlighted that 53% of settlements in rural Carlisle had no activity in terms of local community groups. 20% of settlements had low activity (between 1 and 4 groups), 21% had mid activity (between 5 and 14 groups), and 6% had high activity of 15+ groups.
49% of groups in rural Carlisle meet in Village Halls, 21% in Community
Centres, 14% in Churches, and the other 16% of groups meet in other locations
such as schools. This is a key finding, and highlights the importance of
locally based buildings, such as Village Halls, where community groups can
meet. Throughout the district, the existence of a prominent building in a
settlement can be seen to greatly enhance the activity level within that
settlement. ‘Research examining the impact of Community Fund grants on community buildings has found that resources such village halls can improve quality of life by providing a central focal point for a community’. (Community Fund 2003, www.community-fund.org.uk).
|
| Kirklinton |
People travel to Smithfield and Hethersgill.
| Mossband, Justicetown, Westlinton, Sandysyke, Todhills |
People travel to Longtown, Rockcliffe and Blackford.
| Boustead Hill, Longburgh, Beaumont, Monkhill |
People travel to Burgh-by-Sands, and Kirkandres-on-Eden.
| Roweltown |
Settlement made up of one farm, people travel to Stapleton.
In all of the above examples, it was confirmed by the Parish Clerk, that the local people go to their nearest active settlement, for their social activity. This is irrespective of how far they have to travel.
Therefore in 53% of rural settlements, residents have to travel to access services.
Longtown, Brampton and Dalston have long been seen as the service centres for the surrounding parishes. They have been described as the ‘anchor point’ for services. There is a neutral affinity to those service centres from the parishes around them. Longtown and Brampton have roughly 12 parishes, which they would consider their hinterland. Dalston is less defined as an anchor point, as its parishes go across to Burgh by Sands and Orton, these settlements would probably see Carlisle as their service centre due to the geography.
Number of groups responding 42 (Scotby 4; Wetheral 8; Burgh by Sands 11; Great Orton 2; Great Corby 1; Talkin 2; Haethersgill 1; Houghton 9; Walton 1 and Gaitsgill 3)
Of those responding to each question :-
| 20 (48%) meet weekly or more often and 15 meet monthly |
| 21 (50%) groups were for adults (9x all adults; 5 x older adults and 7 x female adults) |
| 14 (33%) groups were for children and young people (3 x female youth; 1 x all youth; 3 x female under 8's; 6 x all under 8's; 1 x primary school children) |
| 7 (17%) groups were for everyone |
| 22 (52%) groups reported constitutions |
| 30 (71%) groups reported having a chairman |
| 33 (79%) groups reported having a treasurer |
| 29 (69%) groups reported having a secretary |
| 26 (62%)groups reported holding an AGM |
| 31 (74%) groups charged membership or subscription fees |
| 35 (83%) groups kept record/ account books |
| 36 (86%) groups had bank accounts |
| 18 (43%) groups produced a newsletter/ information sheet |
| 25 (60%) groups were run by volunteers only (9 groups with 3 or less volunteers; 11 groups with 4-10 volunteers and 5 groups with 11-30 volunteers) |
· 2 (5%) groups had both part-time staff and volunteers (2 part-time staff each)
| 3 (7%) groups had part-time staff only (1 x 1 staff; 1 x 2 staff and 1 x 4 staff) |
Therefore 88% of groups are run solely by volunteers.
| 1085 people in total were reported as taking part in the groups responding but some people may attend more than one group in their settlement. |
| 2 (5%) groups reported less than 10 members/ group users |
| 16 (38%) groups reported 11-20 members/ group users |
| 18 (43%) groups reported 21-40 member/ groups users |
| 4 (10%) groups reported 41-60 members/ group users |
| 2 (5%) groups reported more than 61 members/ group users |
Therefore 96% of groups have more than 11 members.
| 27 (64%) groups said they did not require any help/advice |
| 17 (40%) groups said they would like immediate help (7 x funding; 4 x recruiting volunteers; 5 x constitutions/Charity Law etc and 1 x transport) in the next 12 months. |
Therefore 40% of groups identified an immediate need for help in the next 12 months.
| 31 (74%) groups said they saw no problems for the next 12 months. |
| 10 (24%) groups did see problems for the next 12 months (2 x funding; 3 x recruiting volunteers; 1 x transport and 3 x falling user/ member numbers due to increasing age) |
| Current funding for groups was reported from a variety of sources or combination of sources (11 x fundraising events; 20 x subscriptions/ membership fees; 15 x weekly fees; 3 x individual donations; 4 x grants; 1 was sponsored by the church and one reported no running costs) |
| Some reasons for not asking for help or for feeling help was not needed were reported as "never felt the need" ; "managed so far"; "did not feel support available was applicable to them (an under 8's group)" and "financially sound/ costs met". |
Other support networks available to groups were reported as Church; Village hall Committee and national Organisations e.g. W.I. and Girl Guiding UK.
Volunteering in the Carlisle District
It was an aim of the project to look at volunteering within the Carlisle District. This was with a view to produce a work plan, so that the partners could promote volunteering more effectively in the future. Part of this work was to investigate the break-up of the urban-rural divide, of volunteers, and volunteering opportunities within the Carlisle District.
The Census conducted in 2001, states that the population of the Carlisle District is 100,739. 54.5% of this in urban wards, whilst 45.6% in rural wards.
Over the past 12 months (September 2002 to September 2003), 223 volunteers offered their services in the Carlisle District, via the Carlisle Volunteer Bureau. 174 (78%) of these volunteers lived in urban Carlisle, whilst 49 (22%) lived in rural Carlisle.
Over the past 12 months (September 2002 to September 2003), there were 137 volunteer opportunities in the Carlisle District, each requiring volunteers. 123 of these vacancies were based within urban Carlisle, whilst 51 were based in rural Carlisle. (Some of these opportunities were both urban and rural).
Despite 46% of the Carlisle District living in rural wards, only 22% of the volunteers come from rural wards. This suggests a much greater percentage of people living in urban wards become volunteers, compared to those living in rural wards. Some explanations for this, include problems of access and communication.
There is a continuous need to promote volunteering in the Carlisle District, as volunteers are always required for both urban and rural wards. However, it should be our priority as partners to pay special attention to the rural wards. This should include promoting the benefits of volunteering to both potential volunteers, and to organisations seeking volunteers.
The support to rural Carlisle from city centre organisations varied widely. With most organisations seeing the benefits of working in the rural areas, and the need to do so. However, lack of funding was the major obstacle to preventing this.
Home Visits Telephone Support
Community Law Centre Cumbria Support Group
Cumbria Support Group Age Concern Carlisle
Age Concern Carlisle Carlisle Counselling Centre
Cumbria Connexions – Young Farmers NSPCC
Making Space Samaritans
Carlisle Breast Care Support Group Self Injury Support
Alzheimer’s Society
Outreach Cumbria
Support Workers Outreach Work
Age Concern Carlisle Benefits Advice Weekly Sessions
Cumbria Connexions – Young Farmers Carlisle Counselling Centre
Carlisle Mencap Cumbria Deaf Association
NSPCC Carlisle Society for the Blind
Cumbria Cerebral Palsy Self Injury Support
Carlisle and Eden Crossroad Ltd
Carlisle Carers Association
Day Care
Transport
Age Concern Carlisle Age Concern Carlisle
Alzheimer’s Society North Cumbria Community Transport
| Research Methodology | Contents | Evaluation |